Re: dot internal and mDNS

To: Michael Kjörling <c9bc136c6063@ewoof.net>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dot internal and mDNS
From: "mick.crane" <mick.crane@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2024 22:22:43 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] ae08c9c69d55b87bedf3689fe9bfdc35@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] e6ad1af5-06c9-46c0-a3d1-d578c2f83b1b@home.arpa>
References: <[🔎] 38ea391e2433d64f1ef6599f3285a93b@go.goproject.info> <[🔎] Zq4pwXJmUEG85CDQ@mail.bitfolk.com> <[🔎] e6ad1af5-06c9-46c0-a3d1-d578c2f83b1b@home.arpa>

On 2024-08-03 19:57, Michael Kjörling wrote:

On 3 Aug 2024 12:59 +0000, from andy@strugglers.net (Andy Smith):

I believe ICCAN are moving to possibly replacing .local, .home, .lan,
.corp, .mail, .localdomain, (and possibly others) with .internal ?


home.arpa was defined by IANA in 2018. If they go ahead with
.internal then I can only imagine it will be in addition to, not
instead of, home.arpa.


The initial version of the relevant Internet Draft (as published Aug
2) doesn't even mention home.arpa, which seems like an oversight as
the intended use is very similar. Hopefully that will be corrected
before publication as a RFC.

Initially the advice was .home. Then I think BT started using that onmobile network.

Then they said use .local. then they said use .home.

I was going to change everything yet again to home.arpa but now it mightbe .internal?

mick

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dot internal and mDNS
  - From: Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>
- Re: dot internal and mDNS
  - From: Michael Kjörling <c9bc136c6063@ewoof.net>

References:
- dot internal and mDNS
  - From: George at Clug <Clug@goproject.info>
- Re: dot internal and mDNS
  - From: Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>
- Re: dot internal and mDNS
  - From: Michael Kjörling <c9bc136c6063@ewoof.net>

Prev by Date: Re: nsswitch what should come first
Next by Date: Re: nsswitch what should come first
Previous by thread: Re: dot internal and mDNS
Next by thread: Re: dot internal and mDNS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread